Review





Similar Products

93
Miltenyi Biotec pe cy7 anti human hla dr
Pe Cy7 Anti Human Hla Dr, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe cy7 anti human hla dr/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe cy7 anti human hla dr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd human mouse cd11b pe cy7
Human Mouse Cd11b Pe Cy7, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human mouse cd11b pe cy7/product/Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mouse cd11b pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences cd11b pe cy7
Cd11b Pe Cy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd11b pe cy7/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd11b pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences pe cy7
Pe Cy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe cy7/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences cd11b pe cy7 tonbo biosciences rrid ab 2621836
Cd11b Pe Cy7 Tonbo Biosciences Rrid Ab 2621836, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd11b pe cy7 tonbo biosciences rrid ab 2621836/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd11b pe cy7 tonbo biosciences rrid ab 2621836 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher pe cy7 conjugated mouse anti human cd11b
a Flow cytometry gating strategy for human PBMCs. b Flow cytometry to identify intracellular H18 expression in H18N11-infected myeloid cells <t>(CD11b</t> + ), B cells (CD19 + ), and T cells (CD3 + ) among human PBMC at 24 hpi at an MOI of 5. Representative images from n = 4 independent experiments. c Bar graphs showing quantification of WT H18N11-infected PBMC subsets compared to mock controls. Data are mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( *p = 0.0286). d Viral growth kinetics in PBMCs infected with WT H18N11 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. e Flow cytometry gating strategy for human monocyte-derived macrophages. f Flow cytometry to detect intracellular H18 expression in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. Representative images from n ≥ 5 independent experiments. The bar graph shows the quantification of H18-positive cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( **p = 0.0022 for mock vs. WT H18N11 and **p = 0.0043 for mock vs. ΔNS1). g Flow cytometry to determine the viability of monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. The bar graph shows the quantification of dead cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a Tukey’s multiple comparison test with single pooled variance ( ***p = 0.0008 for mock vs. WT H18N11, **p = 0.0025 for WT H18N11 vs. ΔNS1). h Subcellular localization of viral NP (green) and H18 (red) antigens in WT H18N11-infected monocyte-derived macrophages was monitored over time by immunofluorescence. Representative images from n = 3 independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm. i Viral growth kinetics in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments; statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Black asterisks, WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. MOI 0.1; gray asterisks WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. ΔNS1 MOI 5. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Pe Cy7 Conjugated Mouse Anti Human Cd11b, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe cy7 conjugated mouse anti human cd11b/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe cy7 conjugated mouse anti human cd11b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-human cd11b-pe-cy7 icrf44
a Flow cytometry gating strategy for human PBMCs. b Flow cytometry to identify intracellular H18 expression in H18N11-infected myeloid cells <t>(CD11b</t> + ), B cells (CD19 + ), and T cells (CD3 + ) among human PBMC at 24 hpi at an MOI of 5. Representative images from n = 4 independent experiments. c Bar graphs showing quantification of WT H18N11-infected PBMC subsets compared to mock controls. Data are mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( *p = 0.0286). d Viral growth kinetics in PBMCs infected with WT H18N11 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. e Flow cytometry gating strategy for human monocyte-derived macrophages. f Flow cytometry to detect intracellular H18 expression in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. Representative images from n ≥ 5 independent experiments. The bar graph shows the quantification of H18-positive cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( **p = 0.0022 for mock vs. WT H18N11 and **p = 0.0043 for mock vs. ΔNS1). g Flow cytometry to determine the viability of monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. The bar graph shows the quantification of dead cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a Tukey’s multiple comparison test with single pooled variance ( ***p = 0.0008 for mock vs. WT H18N11, **p = 0.0025 for WT H18N11 vs. ΔNS1). h Subcellular localization of viral NP (green) and H18 (red) antigens in WT H18N11-infected monocyte-derived macrophages was monitored over time by immunofluorescence. Representative images from n = 3 independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm. i Viral growth kinetics in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments; statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Black asterisks, WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. MOI 0.1; gray asterisks WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. ΔNS1 MOI 5. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Anti Human Cd11b Pe Cy7 Icrf44, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-human cd11b-pe-cy7 icrf44/product/Becton Dickinson
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-human cd11b-pe-cy7 icrf44 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences anti mouse mac1 pe cy7

Anti Mouse Mac1 Pe Cy7, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti mouse mac1 pe cy7/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse mac1 pe cy7 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Flow cytometry gating strategy for human PBMCs. b Flow cytometry to identify intracellular H18 expression in H18N11-infected myeloid cells (CD11b + ), B cells (CD19 + ), and T cells (CD3 + ) among human PBMC at 24 hpi at an MOI of 5. Representative images from n = 4 independent experiments. c Bar graphs showing quantification of WT H18N11-infected PBMC subsets compared to mock controls. Data are mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( *p = 0.0286). d Viral growth kinetics in PBMCs infected with WT H18N11 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. e Flow cytometry gating strategy for human monocyte-derived macrophages. f Flow cytometry to detect intracellular H18 expression in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. Representative images from n ≥ 5 independent experiments. The bar graph shows the quantification of H18-positive cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( **p = 0.0022 for mock vs. WT H18N11 and **p = 0.0043 for mock vs. ΔNS1). g Flow cytometry to determine the viability of monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. The bar graph shows the quantification of dead cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a Tukey’s multiple comparison test with single pooled variance ( ***p = 0.0008 for mock vs. WT H18N11, **p = 0.0025 for WT H18N11 vs. ΔNS1). h Subcellular localization of viral NP (green) and H18 (red) antigens in WT H18N11-infected monocyte-derived macrophages was monitored over time by immunofluorescence. Representative images from n = 3 independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm. i Viral growth kinetics in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments; statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Black asterisks, WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. MOI 0.1; gray asterisks WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. ΔNS1 MOI 5. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Deciphering bat influenza H18N11 infection dynamics in male Jamaican fruit bats on a single-cell level

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48934-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Flow cytometry gating strategy for human PBMCs. b Flow cytometry to identify intracellular H18 expression in H18N11-infected myeloid cells (CD11b + ), B cells (CD19 + ), and T cells (CD3 + ) among human PBMC at 24 hpi at an MOI of 5. Representative images from n = 4 independent experiments. c Bar graphs showing quantification of WT H18N11-infected PBMC subsets compared to mock controls. Data are mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( *p = 0.0286). d Viral growth kinetics in PBMCs infected with WT H18N11 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 3 independent experiments. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. e Flow cytometry gating strategy for human monocyte-derived macrophages. f Flow cytometry to detect intracellular H18 expression in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. Representative images from n ≥ 5 independent experiments. The bar graph shows the quantification of H18-positive cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Mann–Whitney test ( **p = 0.0022 for mock vs. WT H18N11 and **p = 0.0043 for mock vs. ΔNS1). g Flow cytometry to determine the viability of monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at an MOI of 5 at 24 hpi. The bar graph shows the quantification of dead cells. Data are mean ± SD of n = 5 (ΔNS1) or n = 6 (mock, WT H18N11) independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a Tukey’s multiple comparison test with single pooled variance ( ***p = 0.0008 for mock vs. WT H18N11, **p = 0.0025 for WT H18N11 vs. ΔNS1). h Subcellular localization of viral NP (green) and H18 (red) antigens in WT H18N11-infected monocyte-derived macrophages was monitored over time by immunofluorescence. Representative images from n = 3 independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 µm. i Viral growth kinetics in monocyte-derived macrophages infected with WT H18N11 or ΔNS1 at the indicated MOI. Viral titers were determined by endpoint titration at the indicated time points. Viral titers are the mean ± SD of n = 4 independent experiments; statistical analysis was performed using Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Black asterisks, WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. MOI 0.1; gray asterisks WT H18N11 MOI 5 vs. ΔNS1 MOI 5. The dashed line indicates the detection limit. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Cell surface antigens were stained with BV605-conjugated mouse anti-human CD3 (BioLegend, 1:100), PerCP-Cy5.5-conjugated mouse anti-human CD19 (BioLegend, 1:100), PE/Cy7-conjugated mouse anti-human CD11b (Invitrogen, 1:400) and FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human HLA-DR (BioLegend, 1:100) in FACS buffer.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Infection, Two Tailed Test, MANN-WHITNEY, Titration, Derivative Assay, Comparison, Immunofluorescence

Journal: eLife

Article Title: Context-dependent modification of PFKFB3 in hematopoietic stem cells promotes anaerobic glycolysis and ensures stress hematopoiesis

doi: 10.7554/eLife.87674

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Antibody , Anti-mouse Mac1-PE-Cy7 (clone: M1/70, rat monoclonal) , TONBO biosciences , Cat# 60–0112 U100; RRID: AB_2621836 , (0.5 μL, 1 μL, or 2 μL/mouse).

Techniques: Transplantation Assay, Generated, Cell Cycle Assay, Recombinant, Plasmid Preparation, Over Expression, Knock-Out, Flow Cytometry, ATP Assay, Sequencing, Software